Jesus directed
several stinging parables to the religious leaders during His ministry, like
the story of a king who had prepared a huge banquet celebrating his son’s
wedding (Matthew 22:1-14). Servants, (representing
the prophets within the history of God’s relationship with Israel) were sent by
the king to make invitations. These
servants were met with some disinterest by those who continued their personal
lives. Others mistreated and killed the
king’s servants. Prophets in Israel
didn’t have it easy, that’s for sure!
The king, in
anger, destroyed those who had refused the invitations and instead, sent his
servants out into the common areas, streets and alleys to invite the “bad
and the good alike.”
There seemed to be plenty of them around;
the
hall was full.
There is an
ear-catching ending to this parable. The king found one person attending the
banquet who was not dressed properly. The
king had this person bound and thrown out into the darkness outside where ‘wailing
and grinding of teeth’ would be experienced. Why such
selective brutality?
According to
the parable, the “wedding garment” was the issue. When my family visited Italy during the hot summer
several years ago, there were obviously many churches, cathedrals, basilicas,
and other holy sites. Most of them had
dress codes and codes of conduct posted outside of the doorways. Many of them strictly enforced those
codes. When we approached one of the
more sacred churches, there was a woman posted to hand out shawls to anyone who
in their opinion were not dressed ‘appropriately’ or what they deemed ‘respectable’
for visiting in ‘God’s house.’ We noticed several women who made a brouhaha
about the shawl, refusing to wear one.
There were docents inside who quietly tossed out the ‘ne’er-do-wells’
outside to wait for the rest of their parties, presumably wailing and grinding
their teeth.
I’m not sure
that’s the meaning of the ‘garment’ in Matthew’s gospel, though. I’ve read that some experts in scripture
write that it’s a euphemism for Baptism, the proper incorporation into the
“hall” or community. But others write
that the “garment” represents how the invitation has changed the invited guest.
Perhaps the invitee just sat there
eating and drinking, but not relating selflessly with the others. Perhaps he was even taking food and drink from
others. He might not have been acting as
invited, but rather entitled. Perhaps he’d
forgotten that there was more than food and drink provided. There was a relationship extended which should
have rearranged the fellow’s actions a bit. Perhaps he wasn’t even wearing a ‘respectable’
demeanor, and a ‘shawl of dignity’ would have corrected the problem.
The “elders
and priests” knew
that Jesus was telling them that He was the same invitation to change, because
of the relationship to which they had always been invited and they didn’t want
in. Jesus was telling them that they
were getting tossed out, not because they were not baptized, but that they
refused to let Him into their temple, because He was dressed differently than
they expected or demanded.
Today, let's
put on a wedding garment, committing ourselves, and witnessing to everyone,
that we’re ready for the banquet of heaven.
No comments:
Post a Comment